Update, June 2026: Windsurf is now Devin Desktop, sold by Cognition. Existing installs updated in place; plan names and prices on this page follow the Devin lineup (Devin Pro at $20/month, Devin Max at $200/month, Devin Teams from $80/month plus $40 per full seat). The Cascade agent was replaced by Devin Local.
Cursor vs Windsurf Comparison 2026
Choosing between Cursor and Windsurf in 2026? This full comparison covers pricing, model access, agents, context windows, team plans, and usage limits, everything you need to pick the right AI code editor.
Quick Verdict
Cursor and Windsurf are both AI-powered code editors built on VS Code, but they solve the same problem in different ways. Cursor now sells The X Subscription, built around its own models (Grok 4.7, Grok 4.6, Grok 4.5, Composer 2.5) in a weekly pool, with third-party models billed separately at API price. Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) is a vertically integrated IDE with its own SWE-2 model and a daily/weekly quota-based usage system.
TL;DR: Cursor Pro is now a legacy plan that new customers can no longer buy (existing subscribers keep it at $20/month). The comparable plan today is Cursor Premium at $30/month, with Cloud Agents and Bugbot included and higher tiers (Super and Ultra) above it. Devin Pro costs less at $20/month (existing Windsurf Pro subscribers keep their earlier $15/month rate), and differentiates with a purpose-built SWE model and its own high-usage tier, Devin Max. Both are excellent, the right pick depends on your workflow, budget, and whether you want Cursor’s extras.
Part of our Best AI Coding Tools 2026 guide. For a comprehensive comparison of all AI coding tools, start there.
Pricing Comparison
Solo Plans
| Plan | Monthly Price | Included Usage | Extra Usage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cursor Free | $0 | Limited Agent and Chat usage | No third-party models |
| Cursor Plus | $8/mo | Weekly Cursor models pool, shared with Grok | No third-party models |
| Cursor Premium | $30/mo | 4x Plus weekly pool | Third-party models at API price from prepaid credit |
| Cursor Super | $100/mo | 15x Plus weekly pool | Third-party models at API price from prepaid credit |
| Cursor Ultra | $200/mo | 50x Plus weekly pool | Third-party models at API price from prepaid credit |
| Devin Free | $0 | Light daily/weekly agent quota | Not available |
| Devin Pro | $20/mo | Daily/weekly agent quota | On-demand at API pricing |
| Devin Max | $200/mo | Higher weekly quota than Pro, no daily cap | On-demand at API pricing |
Cursor’s older plans (Hobby, Pro, Pro+ and Ultra) are legacy: they keep working for existing subscribers but new customers cannot buy them. Cursor maps Hobby to Free, Pro to Premium, Pro+ to Super and Ultra to Ultra. Cursor Pro costs existing subscribers $20/month, while the comparable Premium plan costs $30/month. Devin Pro is priced at $20/month for new subscribers, less than Premium, and existing Windsurf Pro subscribers keep their earlier $15/month price. At the power-user end, Cursor offers Super ($100/month) and Ultra ($200/month). Devin’s equivalent is Devin Max at $200/month for significantly higher quota than Pro. Cursor prices exclude tax.
Team Plans
| Cursor Teams (Premium seat) | Devin Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $30/user/mo (Super seat $100/user/mo) | $80/mo minimum + $40/mo per full seat |
| Included usage | Premium weekly pool per seat | Daily/weekly quota per full seat |
| SSO | Listed | Not specified |
| 10 full seats | 10 Premium seats at $30 each | $480/mo |
| Flex/occasional seats | Not specified | No separate limit (200-member team cap), no per-seat charge, no Devin Desktop |
| SWE-2 access | N/A | Included |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing | Custom pricing |
For a 10-person team of full seats, Devin Teams costs $480/month ($80/month minimum plus $40 per full developer seat) versus 10 Cursor Teams Premium seats at $30 each, so Cursor is the cheaper option at that size. The older Teams Standard seat is legacy and no longer sold to new customers. Cursor’s docs do not say whether Bugbot is included on team seats. Devin’s minimum covers flex members at no extra per-seat charge (every member counts toward a 200-member team cap, and flex seats do not include Devin Desktop), which can lower the effective cost for teams that mix a small core of full seats with many occasional contributors.
Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
Code Completion
Both editors offer unlimited Tab completions on paid plans. The underlying experience differs in approach:
- Cursor Tab uses frontier models for inline completions. Completions are powered by whichever model family the user selects, with automatic routing for Tab vs. chat vs. agent requests.
- Windsurf Tab includes unlimited completions and inline previews across all plans (including Free). Windsurf bundles its Previews feature, which renders UI changes inline before you accept a completion.
Both deliver fast, context-aware suggestions. Windsurf’s inline Previews are a differentiator for frontend-heavy work; Cursor’s model selection lets you tune completion quality per provider.
Chat and Inline Editing
- Cursor provides chat, inline editing, and Cmd+K actions backed by Cursor’s own models. On Premium and above you can also run third-party models such as Claude, GPT or Gemini, billed at API list price from prepaid credit.
- Windsurf provides chat and inline editing through its SWE-2 model. Premium third-party models (Claude, GPT, Gemini families) are also available within the same usage quota.
Agent Mode
This is where both editors are investing heavily in 2026.
- Cursor’s Cloud Agents act autonomously, they can plan multi-step tasks, execute code, create files, run tests, and generate pull requests. Cloud Agents run in a sandboxed environment and can complete tasks asynchronously. This is closer to a “coding teammate” model. Included on Premium and above, along with Automations, Origin and Bugbot, and not included on Plus.
- Windsurf’s Devin Local (formerly Cascade) handles automated multi-file edits with deep awareness of your project structure. Devin Local can create files, modify multiple files in sequence, and iterate based on test results. It is tightly integrated with the editor experience, while Devin Cloud agents handle equivalent work asynchronously and draw from the same usage quota.
Both approaches handle multi-file tasks. Cursor’s Cloud Agents offer more autonomy and can work asynchronously. Windsurf’s Devin Local is more tightly coupled to the editor loop, with Devin Cloud available for asynchronous work.
Context Window
- Cursor: Cursor does not publish a per-plan context window. Max Mode exists only on legacy request-based plans.
- Windsurf: No numeric context-window value is published for Pro or Teams. Enterprise tiers advertise “longer context.” Windsurf uses project-level indexing (swe-grep) to understand your codebase without requiring massive context windows.
For developers working with large monorepos, Cursor does not publish a context window to plan around. Windsurf takes a different approach, using its swe-grep tool and SWE models to retrieve relevant context without loading everything into a single window.
Deployment
- Cursor: No built-in app deployment feature.
- Windsurf: Includes Windsurf Deploys, 1 app deploy/day on Free, unlimited on Pro. This lets developers ship directly from the editor.
Windsurf’s integrated deploy feature is useful for solo developers and prototyping workflows who want to ship without leaving the IDE.
Model Access Comparison
| Cursor | Windsurf | |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor’s own models | Grok 4.7, Grok 4.6, Grok 4.5, Composer 2.5 (included) | N/A |
| OpenAI, Anthropic, Google | Not included. API list price from prepaid credit on Premium and above, unavailable on Free and Plus | Third-party access via usage quota |
| Proprietary models | Cursor’s own models above | SWE-2, swe-grep |
| BYOK support | Not offered on Plus | Not specified |
| Model selection | Cursor models by default, third-party on request | Automatic + manual for premium |
Cursor now leads with its own models and treats third-party ones as a paid extra: you pick Claude, GPT or Gemini when a task needs it and pay API list price from prepaid credit. Windsurf differentiates with a proprietary SWE model specifically trained for software engineering tasks. SWE-2 is purpose-built for coding and may outperform general frontier models on coding-specific workflows.
Usage Limits Deep Dive
The biggest practical difference between these editors is how they meter usage.
Cursor: Weekly Pools
Cursor’s current plans give you one weekly pool for Cursor’s own models, shared with Grok. Higher tiers scale the pool:
| Plan | Weekly pool (Cursor models) |
|---|---|
| Plus | 1x |
| Premium | 4x Plus |
| Super | 15x Plus |
| Ultra | 50x Plus |
Third-party models (Claude, GPT, Gemini) are not part of the pool. On Premium and above they are billed at API list price from prepaid credit, and on Free and Plus they are not available at all. Because the pool is shared with Grok, chat use in the Grok apps also draws it down.
The legacy Pro, Pro+ and Ultra plans work differently for existing subscribers: two usage pools that reset monthly, one for Cursor models and one for third-party models at API price.
Windsurf: Credit-Based System
Devin Pro now uses a daily and weekly agent quota instead of a fixed monthly credit balance. The quota resets automatically; once it’s used, extra usage is billed on-demand at API pricing rather than through a credit-pack purchase.
Which System Is More Predictable?
Cursor’s prepaid credit makes third-party model cost transparent, since you pay API list price for each model and request. Its own models draw on a weekly pool that you cannot translate into dollars. Windsurf’s quota system resets automatically on a daily/weekly cycle, making it simpler to budget but harder to translate into an exact dollar figure per model.
For cost-conscious developers, both editors bill third-party model use at API pricing, so the actual cost depends on which model you use and the size of each request.
Use-Case Scenarios
Scenario 1: Solo Full-Stack Developer
You build web apps end-to-end, switching between frontend and backend code daily.
- Cursor Premium wins if you want Cloud Agents and Bugbot alongside your editor. Cursor’s own models run from the weekly pool, and you can add Claude, GPT or Gemini from prepaid credit at API price for tasks that need them. It costs more than Devin Pro.
- Devin Pro wins if you prefer a simpler workflow. The SWE model is purpose-built for coding, and the daily/weekly quota is often enough for regular development, legacy Windsurf Pro subscribers also keep a lower $15/month rate.
Scenario 2: Backend / Systems Engineer
You work with large codebases, debug distributed systems, and write infrastructure code.
- Cursor Super or Ultra is the better fit if you use your pool heavily. These tiers give 15x or 50x the Plus weekly pool, and complex debugging sessions burn through usage quickly.
- Devin Pro works if your tasks are more focused and you rarely need extremely large context windows. Heavy agent sessions that exceed the daily/weekly quota may need Devin Max instead of top-ups.
Scenario 3: Frontend / Design-Heavy Developer
You work primarily with React/Vue/Svelte components, CSS, and design systems.
- Devin Pro at $20/month is a solid pick for frontend work. Frontend tasks are usually scoped to individual files, so extreme context windows are less critical. Devin Local handles multi-file component refactors well, and Windsurf’s inline Previews add value for UI work.
- Cursor Premium works too but costs $30/month against Devin Pro’s $20/month. Cursor Plus ($8/month) is cheaper, but it has no Cloud Agents, Automations, Origin or Bugbot and no third-party models, so it only suits light use.
Scenario 4: Team Lead / Engineering Manager
You need to provision AI coding tools for your team.
- Cursor Teams Premium seats at $30/user cost less for a 10-person team of full seats than Devin Teams’ $480/month ($80/month minimum plus $40 per full seat). Ten Premium seats at $30 each is the comparable setup, and Super seats are $100 per user for heavier users.
- Devin Teams is worth a look if your team leans on occasional contributors: flex seats have no separate limit and no extra per-seat charge (every member counts toward a 200-member team cap, and flex seats do not include Devin Desktop), so a small core of full seats plus many flex members can end up cheaper than an all-seats Cursor Teams plan. The Cursor seat lists SSO, and its third-party models are billed from the team’s prepaid balance.
Scenario 5: Agency / Freelance Developer
You work across multiple client projects and need flexibility.
- Cursor Premium ($30/month) gives you Cursor’s models, third-party models on request at API price, and a clear upgrade path to Super ($100/month) or Ultra ($200/month) without switching tools.
- Devin Pro is appealing if you’re a legacy Windsurf Pro subscriber keeping the lower $15/month rate, or want a purpose-built SWE model without switching tools.
Integration and Ecosystem
VS Code Compatibility
Both Cursor and Windsurf are built on the VS Code codebase. This means most VS Code extensions, themes, and keybindings work out of the box. Settings can typically be imported from an existing VS Code installation.
However, there are nuances:
- Cursor ships as a standalone editor (not an extension). It is a fork of VS Code, so there can be minor compatibility delays when VS Code ships major updates.
- Windsurf also ships as a standalone editor based on the VS Code platform. Like Cursor, it is a fork rather than an extension.
Neither editor is a VS Code extension, both are full editor replacements. If you rely on niche extensions, test compatibility before committing.
Git Integration
Both editors inherit VS Code’s built-in Git support, including the Source Control panel, diff viewer, and branch management. Cursor’s Cloud Agents can additionally create branches and pull requests as part of autonomous workflows. Windsurf’s Devin Local handles file changes that can be committed through the standard Git workflow.
Terminal and CLI
Both editors include integrated terminals. Cursor’s agent mode can execute terminal commands as part of multi-step task plans. Windsurf’s Devin Local can also execute commands within its agent flow.
Language Support
Since both are VS Code-based, they support all major programming languages through the extension ecosystem, Python, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Java, C++, and beyond. AI model quality varies by language, but both provide broad coverage through their respective model stacks.
What’s New in 2026
The AI coding editor space has evolved significantly. Here are the key developments:
Cursor Updates
- The X Subscription, Cursor now sells Free, Plus ($8), Premium ($30), Super ($100) and Ultra ($200) to new customers. The older Hobby, Pro, Pro+ and Ultra plans are legacy and keep working for existing subscribers.
- SpaceX acquisition, Cursor was acquired by SpaceX on 2026-08-14. Grok apps and X Premium benefits are bundled with the plans, and billing moved to grok.com.
- Cloud Agents, Cursor introduced autonomous Cloud Agents that can plan and execute multi-step coding tasks without constant user input. They can create pull requests and work asynchronously, and are included on Premium and above.
- Max Mode, available only on legacy request-based plans.
- Bugbot, An automated PR review agent. It is included on Premium and above and on the legacy Pro, Pro+ and Ultra plans, and not on Plus or Hobby.
Windsurf Updates
- Devin Desktop rebrand, Windsurf became Devin Desktop under Cognition; existing installs updated in place, and the Cascade agent was replaced by Devin Local.
- Devin Max, A new $200/month tier added alongside the rebrand, offering a significantly higher weekly quota than Pro, with no daily cap.
- SWE-2, Devin’s proprietary model, purpose-built for software engineering tasks, available across paid plans.
- Devin Teams re-priced, Moved to an $80/month team minimum plus $40/month per full developer seat, with flex members that have no separate seat limit.
Industry Trends
Both editors are moving toward agentic workflows, AI that can plan, execute, and iterate on coding tasks with minimal human intervention. Cursor leans toward cloud-based autonomous agents. Windsurf leans toward tightly integrated, editor-native automation. The trend suggests these tools will handle increasingly complex development tasks throughout 2026.
Price/Performance Analysis
Monthly Cost by Usage Profile
| Usage Profile | Cursor (Plan + Est. Overage) | Windsurf (Plan + Est. Overage) |
|---|---|---|
| Light (stays in budget) | Plus $8/mo (no Cloud Agents or Bugbot) | $20/mo |
| Medium (daily use) | Premium $30/mo + third-party models from prepaid credit if needed | $20/mo + on-demand API overage |
| Heavy (consistently over budget) | Super $100/mo or Ultra $200/mo | $200/mo (Max) |
Both editors bill third-party model use at API pricing. At the heavy end, Cursor’s Super and Ultra tiers (15x and 50x the Plus weekly pool) and Devin’s Max tier ($200/month) serve the same purpose: a higher fixed plan instead of open-ended overage.
Annual Billing
Devin Pro is billed monthly only. Cursor’s docs list annual billing for Plus, Premium, Super and Ultra as yearly totals with no per-month equivalent, and the Teams seats have no annual price. Check Cursor’s pricing page for the current totals.
| Cursor Teams | Devin Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Base cost (10 full seats) | 10 Premium seats at $30 each | $480/mo |
| SSO | Listed | Not specified |
| SWE-2 access | N/A | Included |
| Annual price | Not published | Not available |
Team Features
| Cursor Teams (Premium seat) | Devin Teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $30/user/mo | $80/mo minimum + $40/mo per full seat |
| Included usage | Premium weekly pool per seat | Daily/weekly quota per full seat |
| Seat minimum | Not specified | Not specified |
| Admin controls | Yes | Yes |
| Centralized billing | Yes | Yes |
| SSO | Listed | Not specified |
| Usage analytics | Yes | Admin dashboard |
| Shared resources | Shared chats, commands, rules | Not specified |
| Priority support | Not specified | Yes |
| Spend controls | Team-level limits | Team-level refill controls |
Who Should Pick Cursor?
- You are a power user who needs the Super or Ultra usage tiers (15x and 50x the Plus weekly pool)
- You need Cloud Agents, Automations and Bugbot for autonomous coding and PR review (Premium and above)
- Your team needs SSO on a per-seat plan
- You want Cursor’s own models (Grok 4.7, Composer 2.5 and others) with third-party models available at API price on Premium and above
- You want a clear upgrade path from $8 to $30 to $100 to $200/month
Who Should Pick Windsurf?
- You prefer a proprietary SWE model purpose-built for coding
- You like Devin Local (formerly Cascade) for automated multi-file edits
- You want to try Devin Free before committing to a paid quota
- You value integrated deploys directly from the editor
- Budget is a key decision factor and you’re an existing Windsurf Pro subscriber keeping the lower $15/month rate
Side-by-Side Comparison
For a live, always-verified comparison of Cursor and Windsurf plans including the latest pricing and features, use SubChoice:
Compare the legacy Cursor Pro with Devin Pro on SubChoice →
You can also explore individual vendor pages:
- All Cursor plans →
- All Windsurf plans →
- Cursor vs Windsurf for Coding →
- Cursor vs Windsurf for Teams →
Final Verdict
For budget-conscious solo developers: Devin Pro at $20/month (or $15/month if you’re a legacy Windsurf Pro subscriber) is a solid value. You get a daily/weekly agent quota, the purpose-built SWE-2 model, Devin Local for multi-file edits, and integrated deploys.
For power users: Cursor Premium ($30/month) up to Ultra ($200/month) gives you the most headroom. Cloud Agents, Automations and Bugbot are included from Premium up, and Super and Ultra scale the weekly pool 15x and 50x over Plus. Third-party models (Claude, GPT, Gemini) cost extra at API price from prepaid credit, so budget for them if you rely on them. If you already have the legacy Cursor Pro, you keep it at $20/month.
For teams of mostly full seats: Ten Cursor Teams Premium seats at $30 each cost less than Devin Teams at $480/month for an all-seats team. Devin Teams closes the gap for teams with many flex/occasional contributors, since flex seats have no separate limit and don’t add to the per-seat cost. Every member (full or flex) counts toward a 200-member team cap, and flex seats do not include Devin Desktop.
For teams that need SSO: The Cursor Teams Premium seat lists SSO; Devin Teams doesn’t publish SSO pricing, so confirm with sales before assuming parity.
Both editors are actively evolving. Check SubChoice for the latest pricing and feature updates before you subscribe. Considering a general-purpose AI instead? See ChatGPT Plus vs Devin Pro. Evaluating the upgrade path? See the legacy Cursor Pro+ vs Devin Pro.
FAQ
Is Cursor Premium worth $30 per month?
Yes, if you use AI code assistance daily. Premium is the plan new customers get in place of the legacy Cursor Pro, which existing subscribers keep at $20/month. You get 4x the Plus weekly pool for Cursor’s own models, plus Cloud Agents, Automations, Origin and Bugbot. Third-party models are not included and are billed at API list price from prepaid credit. If you only code occasionally, the Free tier or Plus ($8/month) may be enough. For heavy users, Super ($100/month, 15x Plus) and Ultra ($200/month, 50x Plus) give a bigger pool.
Is Devin Pro worth $20 per month?
Yes, for developers who want a straightforward AI coding subscription. You get a daily/weekly agent quota, access to SWE-2 (Devin’s purpose-built coding model) plus frontier models from Claude, GPT, and Gemini, unlimited Tab completions, Devin Local for multi-file edits, and unlimited deploys. Existing Windsurf Pro subscribers keep an earlier $15/month rate.
Can I use Cursor and Windsurf with existing VS Code extensions?
Both are built on VS Code, so most extensions work. However, since both are forks rather than extensions, some niche or deeply integrated extensions may have compatibility issues. Standard extensions for language support, linting, formatting, and themes typically work without problems. Test any mission-critical extensions before committing to either editor.
How do the usage models compare, credits vs dollars?
Cursor’s current plans use one weekly pool for Cursor’s own models, shared with Grok (Premium 4x Plus, Super 15x, Ultra 50x), and bill third-party models at API list price from prepaid credit. Legacy Pro, Pro+ and Ultra instead have two monthly pools. Windsurf uses a daily and weekly agent quota instead of a fixed monthly credit balance; once it’s used, extra usage is billed on-demand at API pricing, or you can move up to Devin Max. Cursor’s prepaid credit is transparent about third-party model cost; Devin’s quota resets automatically, which is simpler to reason about but harder to translate into an exact dollar figure.
What happens when I run out of included usage?
On Cursor’s current plans, third-party models are always billed at API list price from prepaid credit, and Cursor’s own models draw on the weekly pool, so heavy users move up to Super or Ultra. On Windsurf, extra usage past your daily/weekly quota is billed on-demand at API pricing, or you can upgrade to Devin Max for a higher quota. Devin Free has a light daily quota with no paid overage option.
Can I bring my own API keys?
BYOK details aren’t specified in Devin Desktop’s current plan documentation. Cursor does not currently advertise BYOK in its plan documentation either.
Which editor has better autonomous coding features?
Cursor offers Cloud Agents (Premium and above) that can plan and execute multi-step tasks autonomously, including creating branches and pull requests. They run in a sandboxed cloud environment and can work asynchronously. Windsurf offers Devin Local (formerly Cascade) for automated multi-file edits tightly integrated into the editor, plus Devin Cloud agents for asynchronous work that draw from the same usage quota. Cursor’s approach is cloud-native by default; Windsurf splits the work between a local, editor-integrated agent and a cloud agent. Both are capable for daily development work.
Is there a way to try both before committing?
Yes. Cursor offers a Free tier with limited Agent and Chat usage and no third-party models. Windsurf offers Devin Free with a light daily/weekly agent quota and unlimited Tab completions and inline edits. You can evaluate both at zero cost before subscribing to either.
Which is better for large codebases?
Cursor does not publish a per-plan context window (Max Mode exists only on legacy request-based plans). Windsurf takes a different approach with swe-grep (a specialized code search tool) and project-level indexing to retrieve relevant context without requiring massive context windows.
How do team plans compare for a 10-person engineering team?
For a 10-person team of full seats, ten Cursor Teams Premium seats at $30 each cost less than Devin Teams at $480/month ($80/month minimum plus $40 per full seat), so Cursor is the cheaper option at that size. The Cursor seat also lists SSO and team admin controls, and Cursor’s docs do not say whether Bugbot is included on team seats. Devin Teams doesn’t publish SSO pricing. Devin’s flex seats have no separate limit and no extra per-seat charge, which helps teams with many occasional contributors alongside a smaller core of full seats.
Update Log
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-25 | Cursor sections rewritten for The X Subscription: Cursor Pro, Pro+, Ultra and Teams are now labeled legacy, plan recommendations point to Premium, Super, Ultra and the Teams Premium seat, and usage wording follows the weekly pool. |
| 2026-03-03 | Major expansion: added Feature-by-Feature Breakdown (code completion, chat, agent mode, context window, deployment), Model Access Comparison table, Integration and Ecosystem section, What’s New in 2026 section, expanded FAQ to 10 questions, added internal links to compare and explore pages. All prices verified against vendor data (last verified 2026-03-01). |
| 2026-03-01 | Updated with latest verified plan data. Added Cursor Pro+ and Ultra tiers. Added full tier comparison table, depletion estimates, use-case scenarios, benchmark comparison, price/performance analysis with team cost breakdown, and expanded FAQ from 3 to 8 questions. |
| 2026-02-19 | Initial publication. |